You're required to Register to join this contest
2016 Scion iM

It’s a curious turn for To-yota’s so-called “test labo-ra-tory division,” this new model. The iM eschews the overtly Japanese weirdness that established the Scion brand and made the original 2004–2007 xB the most successful of Toyota’s JDM product-line raids. This conventional four-door hatchback with its factory-supplied body kit and metallic-chartreuse paint seems like something Toyota developed during the import-tuner craze and only found parked in a garage in Torrance, California, after the company began planning its move to Texas.

The $19,255 iM joins the stalwart tC, the boffo FR-S, and the new iA (a rebadged Mazda 2 sedan) in filling out Scion’s four-car lineup for 2016. They’re all cheap, small, and hard to sell, a sober referendum on the youthful image Scion was designed to exploit. It’s easy to wonder why they’re not just sold as Toyotas.

Elsewhere on the globe, the iM is a To-yota. It’s the Auris in Europe and Japan, and in some markets it’s a Corolla hatchback. In the U.S., it shares a platform and engine with the Corolla, though the iM uses a control-arm rear suspension that’s more sophisticated than the Corolla’s torsion beam. That’s where the good news ends, because the 1.8-liter four-cylinder they share makes just 137 horsepower and 126 pound-feet of torque here, three horses less than in the Corolla LE Eco.

It took us 8.6 seconds to reach 60 mph in the iM, more than a second slower than the 160-hp Ford Focus, and the Focus isn’t even the quickest hatchback in its class. The Volkswagen Golf goes from zero to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds, its turbocharged 1.8-liter producing 170 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque and making the iM’s naturally aspirated engine seem as dated as mailing that Fast and the Furious DVD back to Netflix.

The iM comes with a standard six-speed manual, though a CVT is also available. The relatively long and imprecise throws of the shifter and the transmission’s three overdrive ratios make it more of a commuter-grade experience, but at least self-shifting ups the iM’s engagement level. It’s a shame that the steering and brakes are so numb, because the iM’s firm ride and planted body seem to indicate untapped chassis potential. Then again, understeer is what you get when you drive the iM to its low 0.80-g roadholding limit, likely let down by its all-season tires.

Published: Monday, November 9, 2015

0 Comment
Verification code:
No Comments
Latest Review
The interior of the Grand Cherokee is quite...
Thursday, May 5, 2016
The conventional narrative is that the minivan...
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
If there’s one thing Infiniti/Nissan seems to...
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
The 2016 Ford Mustang GT coupe V8 with a manual...
Thursday, March 31, 2016
The Holden Captiva line-up again comprises...
Thursday, March 31, 2016
Other Review
Holden Malibu is styling is certainly a strong...
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Car Interior and Lighting Do not feel...
Monday, December 9, 2013
Fiat Panda may not look like a conventional...
Thursday, June 6, 2013
The 2014 SRT Viper is a two-seat supercar coupe...
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
The massive rear wing delivers 220kg of...
Thursday, January 28, 2016